Editorial Team

How the projectgreentea editorial desk works

projectgreentea is maintained through a small editorial workflow led by site editor Mara Lin. The work is not built around a formal committee or outside advisory board; it is a practical notebook process for choosing reader questions, checking tea details, and revising pages when wording or preparation guidance needs tightening.

Most updates begin with a cup-level problem: bitterness, weak aroma, confusing grade language, storage doubts, caffeine expectations, or choosing between Longjing, matcha, sencha, and other loose-leaf green teas. Notes are organized around what can be seen, prepared, tasted, compared, or bought with more care.

Hands comparing green tea leaves and brewed cups during an editorial review
Editorial review stays close to leaves, liquor color, brewing notes, and cautious wording.

What gets checked before a page is revised

  • Reader task: the page should answer a real buying, brewing, storage, tasting, or daily-use question without drifting into sales copy.
  • Observable cue: guidance should point to leaf shape, powder texture, liquor color, aroma, mouthfeel, steep time, water temperature, harvest cue, or storage condition.
  • Claim boundary: antioxidants, caffeine, focus, and energy are handled as general context, not as treatment advice or promised outcomes.
  • Revision need: older pages may be adjusted when a temperature range, sourcing cue, variety explanation, or wellness phrase becomes too loose.

Related site notes

For the editor profile, review Mara Lin. For broader site context, see About projectgreentea and the Editorial Policy.